.. title: Engineering Probability Class 25 Mon 2019-04-15
.. slug: class25
.. date: 2019-04-15
.. tags: mathjax
.. category: class
.. link: 
.. description: 
.. type: text

.. sectnum::
.. contents:: Table of contents
..

Iclicker
--------

All these questions concern math SAT scores, which we assume have a mean of 500 and standard deviation of 100.

#.  What is the probability that one particular score is between 400 and 600?

    A. .34
    #. .68
    #. .96
    #. .98
    #. .9974

#. I take a random sample of 4 students, and compute the mean of their 4 scores.
   What is the probability that that mean is between 400 and 600?

   A. .34
   #. .68
   #. .96
   #. .98
   #. .9974

#. I take a random sample of 9 students, and compute the mean of their 9 scores.
   What is the probability that that mean is between 400 and 600?

   A. .34
   #. .68
   #. .96
   #. .98
   #. .9974

#. What is the standard deviation of the 4-student sample?
   
   A. 25
   #. 33
   #. 50
   #. 100
   #. 200
      
#. What is the standard deviation of the 9-student sample?

   A. 25
   #. 33
   #. 50
   #. 100
   #. 200



Statistics
----------

Now, we  learn **statistics**.   That means, determining parameters of a population by sampling it.   In **probability**, we already know that parameters, and calculate things from them.

We'll start with Leon-Garcia Chapter 8, and add stuff to it.

This course module fits with RPI's goal of a data dexterity requirement for undergrads.  Pres Jackson mentioned this at the spring town meet; see https://president.rpi.edu/speeches/2019/remarks-spring-town-meeting .

Disclosure:  Prof Dave Mendonca and I are co-chairs of the SoE Data Dexterity Task Force,  working out details of this.

   
Hypothesis testing, from text (plus extras)
======================================================

#. Say we want to test whether the average height of an RPI student (called the population) is 2m.

#. We assume that the distribution is Gaussian (normal) and that the standard deviation of heights is, say, 0.2m.

#. However we don't know the mean.

#. We do an experiment and measure the heights of n=100 random students.   Their mean height is, say, 1.9m.

#. The question on the table is, is the population mean 2m?

#. This is different from the earlier question that we analyzed, which was this: What is the most likely population mean?  (Answer: 1.9m.)

#. Now we have a hypothesis (that the population mean is 2m) that we're testing.

#. The standard way that this is handled is as follows.

#. Define a null hypothesis, called H0, that the population mean is 2m.

#. Define an alternate hypothesis, called HA, that the population mean is not 2m.

#. Note that we observed our sample mean to be $0.5 \\sigma$ below the population mean, if H0 is true.

#. Each time we rerun the experiment (measure 100 students) we'll observe a different number.

#. We compute the probability that, if H0 is true, our sample mean would be this far from 2m.

#. Depending on what our underlying model of students is, we might use a 1-tail or a 2-tail probability.

#. Perhaps we think that the population mean might be less than 2m but it's not going to be more.  Then a 1-tail distribution makes sense.

#. That is, our assumptions affect the results.

#. The probability is Q(5), which is very small.

#. Therefore we reject H0 and accept HA.

#. We make a type-1 error if we reject H0 and it was really true.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_errors

#. We make a type-2 error if we accept H0 and it was really false.

#. These two errors trade off: by reducing the probability of one we increase the probability of the other, for a given sample size.

#. E.g. in a criminal trial we prefer that a guilty person go free to having an innocent person convicted.

#. Rejecting H0 says nothing about what the population mean really is, just that it's not likely 2m.

#. Enrichment.  Random sampling is hard.  The US government got it wrong here:
   http://politics.slashdot.org/story/11/05/13/2249256/Algorithm-Glitch-Voids-Outcome-of-US-Green-Card-Lottery

#. The above tests, called **z-tests**, assumed that we know the population variance.

#. If we don't know the population variance, we can estimate it by sampling.

#. We can combine estimating the population variance with testing the hypothesis into one test, called the **t-test**.
   


Dr Nic's videos
===============

Understanding the Central Limit Theorem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YOr_yYPytM

Variation and Sampling Error
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3A0lUkpAko

Understanding Statistical Inference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFRXsngz4UQ

Understanding Hypothesis testing, p-value, t-test - Statistics Help
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zZYBALbZgg


Research By Design videos
=========================


10-1 Guinness, Student, and the History of t Tests
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqfcFCjaE1c






